Those Wacky Japanese

Yes, yes, we’re getting to the round table reviews very soon. But first, let’s class the joint up a little…

S&M HUNTER
S&M Hunter is irresistibly quotable. Its main character spouts all kinds of pretentious nonsense, and even, true to his ecclesiastical garb, quotes the New Testament (while other utterances — “I see your heart. Your heart wants my ropes” — seem more secular in origin). What I enjoyed most about the film was how it hijacks the terse moral shorthand and glib certitude of evangelism for its own anarchic ends. During the movie’s talky prologue, the Hunter essentially preaches to the audience, explicitly laying out the story’s conflict and moral, after which we see both briskly played out, with the gum-snapping, leather-clad Bombers playing the transgressors whose wayward actions meet with exactly those consequences that the moral predetermines. In the end it all plays out like some Bizarro World version of a Chick tract, with those who have given in to evil, rather than being cast into the lake of fire, instead being bound up and helplessly racked with consecutive multiple orgasms.

Arkham Tales #2 now available.

Once a quarter isn’t too often to do some self-promotion that isn’t related to movies, is it? (If it is, just keep it to yourself.)

I wish to announce that, after long labor, issue #2 of Arkham Tales is available for free download, either web-optimized or designed for booklet printing — just pull out your handy-dandy saddle stapler, and you’re ready to go!

Download the new issue (or the previous issue) right here.

Putting the rêve in revenant

Month of the Alternative Living Dead

Death Smiles at Murder (1971)

Before I get to the current roundtable, there’s the little matter of the last one I haven’t attended to yet (Yes, yes, I know; that was last year. Shut up).

So here’s an odd, arty little film whose undead creature is as unpredictable as it is.

I Take Care of the Place While The Master is Away

I have committed many offenses against human decency, but an enthusiastically positive review of Manos? I may have finally crossed the line.

MANOS: THE HANDS OF FATE
It’s a fitting name for the movie, because my fate seems intrinsically intertwined with Manos. If any movie was my long lost evil twin brother, it would be Manos. I know that one day, billions of years from now, as the earth boils and dies, Manos and I are fated to stand atop a craggy cliff as a tumultuous sea of lava crashes below us and volcanoes spew fire and dinosaurs into the sky. There we stand, face to face, battered, bloody, aware of the fact that we are both doomed, yet never the less unable to extract ourselves from the eternal combat into which we have been and always shall be locked. I have seen the road lain before me, and I know that it leads to Manos: The Hands of Fate just as surely as its road leads to me. My ties to Manos are sundry, and even I did not realize most of them existed until I started peeling back the layers of the onion, each one confronting me with a revelation more unspeakable than the last, until one day I found myself actually standing on the very grounds that served as the location for the film, at which time I fell to my knees, cried out to the heavens, and went stark raving mad.

Unleaguefathomable

banner-aip1

Thanks to the vagaries of the international postage system, the film I planned to review hasn’t arrived yet; as a consequence, the little history lesson I had in mind is now emerging out of order. However, I figured any posting was better than none…literally none, since everyone else seems to be suffering from PBFLD (Post-B-Fest Letdown Disorder). I, alas, haven’t that excuse. So—

THE PHANTOM FROM 10,000 LEAGUES (1955)

Even as early as 1955, even before there was such a thing as AIP, its progenitor company was churning out films with what would soon be recognisible as its trademarks: outrageously inaccurate advertising, threadbare production values, a half-baked screenplay and a crappy, crappy monster. Just how crappy? Let me put it this way: this one was evidently arrested and charged with impersonating a sea-serpent.

tpfttl55-mugshot

Oh, man…

It’s roundtable time again. But having the independent spirit that comes with reviewing unknown movies, I have decided to not put up my choice for the A.I.P. roundtable right now. (Just let me polish my review – it’ll be up in a couple of weeks.) Instead, I will give readers a review of a major studio movie that was barely released, My Man Adam. It seemed like an appealing movie when I found it – an ’80s movie (I grew up in that era) about a non-conformist who has a wild imagination. But it didn’t take me too long to find out why the movie was barely released. Read and learn why, and also learn why you should be wary of anything released on Key Video.

Godzilla's Seafood Diet

GODZILLA VS. THE SEA MONSTER
Godzilla vs. the Sea Monster, viewed today, seems like it was inevitably the Godzilla movie that was going to get made in 1966. This was, after all, the year in which the author of James and the Giant Peach was commissioned to write a James Bond movie in which spaceships eat other spaceships and a villain’s space-age compound is housed within a hollowed-out volcano. The collision between the stodgy, adult-driven popular culture of the early sixties and the encroaching influence of sixties youth culture and it’s defining mistrust for authority had resulted in camp becoming the dominant aesthetic in seemingly every pop culture producing country in the world, and it was no longer safe for any pop icon born of the old order to be presented without a conspicuous display of tongues being placed firmly in cheek. Also, recent years had for the first time seen the vast majority of Television shows and movies being produced in color, something that producers were demonstrably eager to exploit via the widespread use of pop art-inspired, comic book-like palettes of bright primary colors, a tendency that is well in evidence in some of Godzilla vs. the Sea Monster’s sets. Lastly, the influence of the aforementioned Bond films had reached critical mass by 1966, which makes it unsurprising that Godzilla’s handlers would draw upon their tropes as well. In short, all of these trends listed above come together in Godzilla vs. the Sea Monster, resulting in it being probably the most overtly comical, modish, and giddily irreverent film in the Godzilla series.

I Was A Teenage Rock 'n' Roll Cowboy Juvenile Deliquent Caveman Monster

Roundtable time again already!? Yup, and this time around the B-Masters are paying tribute to the company that never met a social trend it couldn’t exploit; that set new and still standing records for the gap between the content of the advertising art and the content of the completed film; and (perhaps above all) that unleashed Roger Corman upon an unsuspecting public.

banner-aip1

.
It’s ON TIME & UNDER BUDGET: A Salute To American International Pictures. All throughout the month of February at the B-Masters’ Blog!

Mired in Manos

I was hoping to have a review of Manos ready for today, but predictably, my attempt has become a sprawling odyssey that is taking up more time than I reckoned on. So until then, here’s our wee tidbits for the week:

It's a disaster!

My friends, I need your help.

While I have no qualms about ‘fessing up to my passion for shark films, Exorcist rip-offs and manskirts, I am just a little shame-faced about admitting to an equal passion for disaster movies, whether the man’s-hubris kind, the nature-strikes-back kind, or the transportation-out-of-control kind – and worse still, particularly for the dreadful, last-gasp-of-the-first-wave ones, like Beyond The Poseidon Adventure, When Time Ran Out and Cave-In! But so it is; and today I make good on a long-standing promise to myself, and welcome disaster movies into the AYCYAS! reviewing fold.

How do you define a disaster film? The line between genres can be very thin, but to my mind the answer is, focus and attitude. Thus, Airport ’75 is a disaster movie; Die Hard 2 is not. The Poseidon Adventure is a disaster movie; Titantic is not. Earthquake is a disaster movie; San Francisco – despite having (in my opinion) the best realised film earthquake ever – is not.

The curious thing about the disaster movie is how long it took to find itself as a genre. After the first ever disaster movie, it was two decades before 1954’s The High And The Mighty inspired a crop of borderline, transportation-related disaster movies, Zero Hour! (1957), The Crowded Sky (1960) and The Last Voyage (1960) among them. The disaster movie as we know it today did not come into its own until Airport which, while not in fact a disaster movie itself, was certainly the catalyst for what followed.

So my first question to all of you is this: what other films, before Airport, would you classify as disaster movies? What have I missed?

My second question is more specific, and probably (unfortunately) much harder to answer. By now, pretty much everyone is aware that Flying High! / Airplane! is a twisted remake of Zero Hour! What you may not know, however, is that Zero Hour! was itself the remake of a teleplay called Flight Into Danger, filmed for and broadcast on Canadian TV in 1956, and starring as the reluctant hero – James Doohan. Since discovering this factoid, Flight Into Danger has become one of my film-hunting Holy Grails, although sadly I have discovered no evidence that it was ever commercially available, or even that it still exists. If anyone out there has any information, please drop me a line!

And now, our feature presentation:

d33-wave6bDELUGE (1933)

The great-granddaddy of all disaster movies, focussing upon a love triangle in the aftermath of a worldwide catastrophe, which climaxes with the destruction of New York City.

Some clichés have awfully deep roots…