He was tall, lean and aristocratic-looking. He had piercing eyes, a mellifluous & powerful baritone voice, and a commanding stage presence. You could hand him a script in the morning, and by early afternoon he knew not only his own part, but everybody else’s as well. He was a supremely accomplished actor on stage and screen, who established himself as a member of John Ford’s regular troupe, and worked with other fine directors including Douglas Sirk and Rouben Mamoulian.
But we’re prepared to forgive him for all that.
For unlike other talented actors — who find themselves forced to take on ever-more embarrassing roles as age and changing fashions catch up with them — John Carradine actually liked making terrible movies. He made ’em even when he didn’t have to. He had a tremendous sense of humor about himself and his career, and found that doing low-low-low-budget schlock gave him the chance to cut loose and really enjoy himself. Thus he also found himself listed in the stock company of directors like Al Adamson and Jerry Warren, making some of the most ridiculous movies ever made.
So join us through the month of May, as we look at the (often simultaneous) highs and lows in the career of a man who rarely turned down a role:

CARRADINE, Thou Wayward Son
#1 by The Rev. on May 5, 2015 - 1:14 am
Quote
I’ve taken in quite a few of Carradine’s worst offerings over the last couple of years, in one of those odd happenstances that I’m sure we’ve all experienced at some point. I’m so used to actors slumming and not giving their all in things like this, and I found myself marveling at the fact that he seemed to be having a blast in them. Even if the role was small and the movie was agonizingly dull, without fail he was a bright spot. I mean, to a near-Vincent Price degree, which is about the highest compliment I can give. I chalked it up to him being a professional, talented working actor.
I finally was disabused of this notion when I recently saw the trailer for Vampire Hookers on Bizarre TV. It wasn’t the clips of him appearing to have a great time, which I’ve come to expect now, but rather his voice-overs during the trailer. He sounded positively giddy, as if he was laughing his ass off when the mic wasn’t on, utterly delighted by the fact that he was in a movie called Vampire Hookers. It made me wonder if he was doing these movies on purpose. Based on this foreword to the upcoming roundtable, it seems this is the case; which means he’s moved up my index of favorite actors to sit comfortably in the highest slots (to which he was pretty close already, admittedly).
And yes, I totally want to see Vampire Hookers now; and yes, I am hoping with all my might that it proves an exception to the rule and lives up to its trailer.
#2 by The Rev. on July 9, 2015 - 12:31 am
Quote
I waited to see if anyone reviewed it, but they didn’t, so here I go.
I found VH a day or two after posting this and watched it. I….half enjoyed it. First of all, it’s false advertising, because only one of the vampires does any hooking. I’d expected it to be a comedy from the trailer, and to be fair some of it was pretty funny. Mostly, though, the humor was labored and just made me grumpy. This is exemplified in the vampires’ “Renfield,” who’s a fat Filipino guy with scraggly facial hair that wants to be a vampire, too. Two of the funnier bits (including the one I laughed the hardest at) feature him. Unfortunately, he’s also the source of a running series of fart jokes, a couple of which are pretty damn gross. As you might imagine, most of the funny bits (and all of the good acting) feature Carradine, who appears to be as happy as a clam, quoting Shakespeare and drinking bloody Marys (heavy on the blood). His companions are easy on the eyes, and all get nude at some point, so there’s that.
(The next paragraph contains spoiler-y stuff.)
I was rooting for Carradine and his vamp companions almost immediately, and praying the main characters died. Naturally, the “funny” one of the pair lasted to the end of the movie, and Carradine and his ladies all died again. (Interestingly, falling masonry can kill vampires.) The final shot is a bit confusing, all things considered, but I’d say it’s a happy ending. Maybe bittersweet, what with Carradine and the lady vamps being gone.
(All clear.)
Overall, I’m more sorry I watched it than not, which I really didn’t expect. You’d think I’d have learned to stop letting trailers get my hopes up after Megashark vs. Giant Octopus, dammit.
#3 by El Santo on May 5, 2015 - 9:19 am
Quote
Another astonishing thing about the elder Carradine was his ability to make sheer gobbledegook sound like it meant something. The best example I can think of is his performance in The Astro-Zombies, where nothing that comes out of his mouth makes a lick of real-world sense, but it all sounds authoritative.
#4 by AcademicLurker on May 6, 2015 - 4:30 pm
Quote
A while back I watched Bram Stoker’s Dracula with the director’s commentary turned on, and I recall Francis Coppola saying that John Carradine was his favorite Dracula.
#5 by David Lee Ingersoll on May 8, 2015 - 8:25 am
Quote
I think it’s awesome that Carradine played Dracula in both House of Frankenstein/Dracula and Billy the Kid Meets Dracula.